MATARI INTELLIGENCE
Matari organizes authorized clinical records into an evidence-linked trajectory, keeps uncertainty visible, and brings the source forward for an authorized clinician to review.
WHAT MATARI FINDS
A mock patient journey built from scheduling, encounter, result and follow-up records created across Practice Foundation. Switch views to see how Matari Intelligence connects those sources without replacing clinical review.
Each node is an example source document. Matari keeps the source attached to whatever it surfaces, so a clinician can always check the original.
WHAT THE REVIEWER SEESEach document is correct on its own.The relationship across them is manual work — and it is the work that gets skipped when the room is waiting.
Matari Intelligence does not declare the diagnosis. It brings the pattern and the evidence forward so an authorized clinician can verify the context and decide what it means.
INTELLIGENCE CAPABILITIES
Six connected capabilities inside the current platform.
Versioned summaries, important events, encounters, documents and care plans stay connected across the patient record, with links back to supporting sources.
WHY IT MATTERSThe next visit should begin with what changed, what persisted and what still needs review — not another search through disconnected tabs.
Scanned PDFs, referral letters and outside lab reports: extracted, checked for source date, and committed with warnings a human can override before anything lands in the chart.
WHY IT MATTERSInteroperability that only works when the other side is modern is not interoperability. Most of a patient's history still arrives as paper.
Ambient audio, transcribed with speaker-attributed turns you can correct by hand, then drafted into a note, discharge document or care plan from the transcript you approved.
WHY IT MATTERSThe note is the tax. Reviewing a draft costs a fraction of composing one at nine in the evening.
Reusable templates, transcript-linked drafts, version checks, amendments and export keep clinical documentation inside a reviewable encounter workflow.
WHY IT MATTERSGenerated text should never silently become the chart. Review state and authorship must remain visible.
Anterior and posterior 3D body models carry encounter-scoped findings, symptoms and procedures. A structured dental chart supports review, correction and export.
WHY IT MATTERSAnatomy is spatial. Prose loses what a pin keeps — and the next clinician reads the pin, not the paragraph.
Patient- and encounter-scoped assistance uses the active chart, documents, care plan and available imaging, with evidence-linked output and clinician-reviewed actions.
WHY IT MATTERSAn assistant that cannot cite the chart is a rumour. Grounding and explicit review are the whole difference.
i Matari Intelligence availability depends on configured services and practice entitlement. Clinical review remains required.
GOVERNED CLINICAL LEARNING
In developmentA medication is started. A monitoring result changes. The treatment response or required follow-up is not documented. Matari is being designed to help an authorized clinician turn that reviewed event into bounded guidance that can return during similar future care—alongside the chart evidence, not in place of clinical judgment.
Medication changes, monitoring results, documented treatment response and follow-up status stay connected to the patient record.
→An authorized clinician reviews the source evidence and uncertainty, then decides what the event means and where the lesson can apply.
→The clinician-reviewed guidance retains its source, approved care context, owner, audience and history instead of becoming unexplained model behavior.
→During similar future care, Matari can surface the guidance beside relevant medications, allergies, diagnostics, treatment history and follow-up evidence.
EXAMPLE CLINICAL REVIEWMedication monitoring with an unresolved outcome.
Composite example · no patient dataREVIEW · CLINICIAN-VERIFIED GUIDANCEWhen a medication plan depends on repeat monitoring, bring the latest result, medication context, documented treatment response and unresolved follow-up into clinician review before the episode is considered complete.Source, scope and reviewer remain attached.
These are intended benefits, not guaranteed clinical outcomes. The aim is to support continuity and create better conditions for patient outcomes; authorized clinicians decide what action, if any, is appropriate.